[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190503165646.GK55449@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 17:56:46 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>, Kuehling@...gle.com,
Felix <Felix.Kuehling@....com>, Deucher@...gle.com,
Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>, Koenig@...gle.com,
Christian <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/17] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in
fs/userfaultfd.c
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 03:25:06PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> This patch is a part of a series that extends arm64 kernel ABI to allow to
> pass tagged user pointers (with the top byte set to something else other
> than 0x00) as syscall arguments.
>
> userfaultfd_register() and userfaultfd_unregister() use provided user
> pointers for vma lookups, which can only by done with untagged pointers.
>
> Untag user pointers in these functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> ---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index f5de1e726356..fdee0db0e847 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + uffdio_register.range.start =
> + untagged_addr(uffdio_register.range.start);
> +
> ret = validate_range(mm, uffdio_register.range.start,
> uffdio_register.range.len);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1514,6 +1517,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_unregister(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
> if (copy_from_user(&uffdio_unregister, buf, sizeof(uffdio_unregister)))
> goto out;
>
> + uffdio_unregister.start = untagged_addr(uffdio_unregister.start);
> +
> ret = validate_range(mm, uffdio_unregister.start,
> uffdio_unregister.len);
> if (ret)
Wouldn't it be easier to do this in validate_range()? There are a few
more calls in this file, though I didn't check whether a tagged address
would cause issues.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists