lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 20:21:10 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To:     Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
Cc:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mips: Reserve memory for the kernel image resources

Hello Paul

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 06:45:39PM +0000, Paul Burton wrote:
> Hi Serge,
> 
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:24:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Just reviewed and tested your series on my machine. I tagged the whole series
> > in a response to the cover-letter of [1].
> 
> Thanks for the review & testing; that series is now in mips-next.
> 
> > Could you please proceed with this patchset review procedure? There are
> > also eight more patches left without your tag or comment.  This patch
> > is also left with no explicit tag.
> > 
> > BTW I see you already applied patches 1-3 to the mips-next, so what shall I
> > do when sending a v2 patchset with fixes asked to be provided for patch 12
> > and possibly for others in future? Shall I just resend the series without that
> > applied patches or send them over with your acked-by tagges?
> 
> I've so far applied patches 1-7 of your series to mips-next, and stopped
> at patch 8 which has a comment to address.
> 
> My preference would be if you could send a v2 which just contains the
> remaining patches (ie. patches 8-12 become patches 1-5), ideally atop
> the mips-next branch.
> 
> The series looks good to me once the review comments are addressed, but
> no need to add an Acked-by - it'll be implicit when I apply them to
> mips-next.
> 

Agreed. I'll do it shortly.

-Sergey

> Thanks,
>     Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists