linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABeXuvqRSO_0pkU2i0eNK2JtRZcPquF0X0h_GJANiQvEuisQHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 11:21:50 -0700
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Eric Wong <e@...24.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Omar Kilani <omar.kilani@...il.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:34 PM Eric Wong <e@...24.org> wrote:
>
> Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > Sorry, I was trying a new setup at work. I should have tested it.
> > My bad, I've checked this one.
>
> Thanks.  This is good w.r.t. epoll_pwait and ppoll when applied
> to 5.0.11 (no fs/io_uring.c).

Thanks. Al, would you be picking up this patch? I can resend it.

> Can't think of anything which uses pselect or aio on my system;
> but it looks right to me.
>
> > I've removed the questionable reported-by, since we're not sure if
> > it is actually the same issue.
>
> Yes, I hope Omar can test this, too.

Omar, would you be able to test this?

Thanks,
Deepa