lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 12:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
To:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>
cc:     Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, palmer@...ive.com, bp@...en8.de,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, mchehab@...nel.org, sachin.ghadi@...ive.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: sifive: Add EDAC platform driver for SiFive SoCs

Hi James,

On Thu, 2 May 2019, James Morse wrote:

> Having an separately posted dependency like this is tricky, as this code can't be
> used/tested until the other bits are merged.

...

> Looks good to me. I think this patch should go with its two dependencies, I'm not sure why
> it got split off...

The split was due to my suggestion to Yash, I think.  The motivation was 
to decouple the L2 cache controller driver's journey upstream from the 
EDAC driver's upstream path.  The patches will go up via separate trees, 
so the idea was to avoid blocking the L2 cache controller driver on the 
EDAC driver review path.

Thanks for your review,


- Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists