linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: avoid Oops if DMA setup fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190503043406.GZ14916@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 13:34:06 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...omium.org>
Cc:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: avoid Oops if DMA setup fails

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:25:17PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Currently in sst_dsp_new() if we get an error return from sst_dma_new()
> we just print an error message and then still complete the function
> successfully.  This means that we are trying to run without sst->dma

Please don't bury patches in the replies to existing threads, it makes
it harder to spot them.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)