linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V4] ASoC: fsl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 12:56:49 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
        "Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V4] ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function

Hi Mark, 
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 01:27:31PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 09:13:58AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> 
> > I am checking, but I don't know why this patch failed in your side. I 
> > Tried to apply this patch on for-5.1, for 5.2,  for-linus  and for-next, all are
> > Successful.  The git is git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git.
> 
> > I can't reproduce your problem. Is there any my operation wrong?
> 
> The error message I got was:
> 
> Applying: ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function
> error: patch failed: sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c:9
> error: sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0001 ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function
> 
> which is the header addition.  I can't spot any obvious issues visually
> looking at the patch, only thing I can think is some kind of whitespace
> damage somewhere.

I downloaded this v4 from patchwork and resubmitted a v5 for a
test. Would you please try to apply that one?

If my v5 works vs. having merge conflict at v4, maybe something
wrong with Git version of Shengjiu's? I compared my v5 and his
v4 using vimdiff, there is no much difference of whitespace.

Thanks
Nicolin