linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] tpm: Reserve the TPM final events table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 08:49:27 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Szczepanek <bsz@...ihalf.com>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thiébaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] tpm: Reserve the TPM final events table

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:03:08AM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:32 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Bartosz Szczepanek wrote:
> > > I may be a little late with this comment, but I've just tested these
> > > patches on aarch64 platform (from the top of jjs/master) and got
> > > kernel panic ("Unable to handle kernel read", full log at the end of
> > > mail). I think there's problem with below call to
> > > tpm2_calc_event_log_size(), where physical address of efi.tpm_log is
> > > passed as (void *) and never remapped:
> >
> > Not late. This is not part of any PR yet. Thank you for the
> > feedback!
> >
> > Matthew, can you send an updated version of the whole patch set
> > with fixes to this issue and also reordering of the includes?
> 
> Yes, I'll resend and let's do this again for 5.3.

Agreed, better not rush but get it right once.

/Jarkko