lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190504090107.GC13840@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 4 May 2019 11:01:07 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Dragan Cvetic <draganc@...inx.com>
Cc:     "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Derek Kiernan <dkiernan@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/12] misc: xilinx_sdfec: Add open, close and ioctl

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 04:46:12PM +0000, Dragan Cvetic wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Thursday 2 May 2019 18:24
> > To: Dragan Cvetic <draganc@...inx.com>
> > Cc: arnd@...db.de; Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> > mark.rutland@....com; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Derek Kiernan <dkiernan@...inx.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/12] misc: xilinx_sdfec: Add open, close and ioctl
> > 
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:04:58PM +0100, Dragan Cvetic wrote:
> > > Add char device interface per DT node present and support
> > > file operations:
> > > - open(),
> > > - close(),
> > > - unlocked_ioctl(),
> > > - compat_ioctl().
> > 
> > Why do you need compat_ioctl() at all?  Any "new" driver should never
> > need it.  Just create your structures properly.
> 
> This was a comment from Arnd, see https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/19/377.
> Please advise.

Why do you need a compat_ioctl callback when there is nothing to fix up?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ