linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.0 08/32] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190504102452.794161677@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat,  4 May 2019 12:24:53 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 08/32] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing set_rxnfc

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit f949a12fd697479f68d99dc65e9bbab68ee49043 ]

The "fs->location" is a u32 that comes from the user in ethtool_set_rxnfc().
We can't pass unclamped values to test_bit() or it results in an out of
bounds access beyond the end of the bitmap.

Fixes: 7318166cacad ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Add support for ethtool::rxnfc")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
@@ -854,6 +854,9 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_set(struct d
 	     fs->m_ext.data[1]))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY && fs->location >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
 	    test_bit(fs->location, priv->cfp.used))
 		return -EBUSY;
@@ -942,6 +945,9 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_del(struct b
 	struct cfp_rule *rule;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (loc >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/* Refuse deleting unused rules, and those that are not unique since
 	 * that could leave IPv6 rules with one of the chained rule in the
 	 * table.