[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 08:07:51 -0400
From: rhkramer@...il.com
To: vsnsdualce2@...chan.it
Cc: debian-user@...ts.debian.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Ivanov <qmastery16@...il.com>, mailinglists@...tcrews.com,
jhasler@...sguy.com, scdbackup@....net, richard@...nut.gen.nz,
curty@...e.fr, jmtd@...ian.org, mick.crane@...il.com,
tomas@...team.de, steve@...val.com, joe@...trading.com,
rms@....org, esr@...rsus.com
Subject: Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).
On Sunday, May 05, 2019 12:51:15 AM vsnsdualce2@...chan.it wrote:
> Bar rules do not allow lawyers to serve under a non-lawyer
> in
> an organization, and the organization was essentially a pro-bono law
> firm
> (which really needed a attorney in it's ranks...)
That's interesting, but (off the point of this email exchange), it puzzles me
-- many corporations headed by non-lawyers have lawyers on staff, so I'm
guessing that the statement you made applies only to organizations like law
firms, or, the lawyers on the staff of a non-law corporation are in something at
least a little different than the normal employer / employee relationship.
(PS: I stand corrected on Kuhn being a lawyer -- thanks for the correction.)
Now I have to debate (with myself) whether to prune the cc list -- I forget
the original post -- was it really this widespread?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists