[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 14:41:21 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:17:48AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:31:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 5/4/19 8:05 PM, Dan Rue wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
> > > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > Regressions detected.
> > >
> >
> > Confusing. What are the regressions ? Below it says that there are none.
>
> My mistake for dashing it off too quickly. No regressions on arm64, arm,
> x86_64, and i386.
Thanks for confirming this.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists