[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <085da32a-8c3a-bf91-38b0-4802375ae414@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 21:51:15 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@...ayev.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: xe-linux-external@...co.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based
systems
On 05.05.2019 21:34, Ruslan Babayev wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@...ayev.com>
> Cc: xe-linux-external@...co.com
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/i2c.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
Regarding the formal part:
- It should be [PATCH net-next]
- Commit description is missing (scripts/checkpatch.pl should have complained)
And maybe it would be better to split exporting i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
and extending sfp.c to two patches. If Wolfram acks the i2c patch, then I think
the series could go through the netdev tree. Eventually up to David.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists