linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 4 May 2019 20:31:36 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

On 5/4/19 8:05 PM, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
>> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected.
> 

Confusing. What are the regressions ? Below it says that there are none.

Guenter

> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 5.0.13-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-5.0.y
> git commit: c6bd3efdcefd68cc590853c50594a9fc971d93cd
> git describe: v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.0-oe/build/v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
> 
> No fixes (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
> 
> Ran 25060 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
> 
> Environments
> --------------
> - dragonboard-410c
> - hi6220-hikey
> - i386
> - juno-r2
> - qemu_arm
> - qemu_arm64
> - qemu_i386
> - qemu_x86_64
> - x15
> - x86
> 
> Test Suites
> -----------
> * build
> * install-android-platform-tools-r2600
> * kselftest
> * libgpiod
> * libhugetlbfs
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-commands-tests
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> * ltp-cve-tests
> * ltp-dio-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-mm-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-timers-tests
> * perf
> * spectre-meltdown-checker-test
> * v4l2-compliance
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-open-posix-tests
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
>