[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190506074824.GA40476@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
* Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> I _am_ bending the C rules a bit with the "extern some_var; asm
> volatile(".section some_section\nsome_var: blabla");". I should
> probably ask on the gcc list whether this way of defining a local
> symbol in inline assembly and referring to it from C is supposed to
> work, or it just happens to work by chance.
Doing that would be rather useful I think.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists