[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB44815E080F8639F597BD085E88300@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 08:50:51 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org" <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"van.freenix@...il.com" <van.freenix@...il.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: fsl: scu: add ocotp binding
Hi Aisheng,
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: fsl: scu: add ocotp binding
>
> > From: Peng Fan
> > Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 9:28 PM
> >
> > NXP i.MX8QXP is an ARMv8 SoC with a Cortex-M4 core inside as system
> > controller(SCU), the ocotp controller is being controlled by the SCU,
> > so Linux need use RPC to SCU for ocotp handling. This patch adds
> > binding doc for i.MX8 SCU OCOTP driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Cc: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> > Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt | 13
> > +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt
> > index 5d7dbabbb784..9cb7d52bdf26 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt
> > @@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ ID in its "clocks" phandle cell.
> > See the full list of clock IDs from:
> > include/dt-bindings/clock/imx8qxp-clock.h
> >
> > +OCOTP bindings based on SCU Message Protocol
> > +------------------------------------------------------------
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx8qxp-ocotp"
> > +- #address-cells: Must be 1. Contains byte index
> > +- #size-cells: Must be 1. Contains byte length
> > +
>
> Please put this unimportant one to the last.
ok. I just followed alphabetical order as OCOTP, Pinctrl, RTC sequence.
Will move it to last in V2.
> And it's better to mention the optional child nodes for data cells as Above
> #address-cells and #size-cells are used for it.
> Just like:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/imx-ocotp.txt
>
> > Pinctrl bindings based on SCU Message Protocol
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > @@ -177,6 +184,12 @@ firmware {
> > ...
> > };
> >
> > + ocotp: imx8qx-ocotp {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
>
> Not sure if it's a free choice, but AFAIK we usually write #address-cells and
> #size-cells under compatible string according to the example in DT spec and
> doc.
Fix in V2.
Thanks,
Peng
> https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Usage
> https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/releases/tag/v0.
> 2
>
> Maybe Rob can comment to avoid confusing.
>
> Otherwise, this patch seems good to me.
>
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng
>
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-ocotp";
> > + };
> > +
> > pd: imx8qx-pd {
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-scu-pd", "fsl,scu-pd";
> > #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > --
> > 2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists