| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFCwf10oiXVzQP6sAVmuH2p7O+0eKVGqLPa6s144k0quQr0jhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 13:21:40 +0300
From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] habanalabs: fix debugfs code
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:15 PM Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 4:56 PM Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > This fixes multiple things in the habanalabs debugfs code, in particular:
> >
> > - mmu_write() was unnecessarily verbose, copying around between multiple
> > buffers
> > - mmu_write() could write a user-specified, unbounded amount of userspace
> > memory into a kernel buffer (out-of-bounds write)
> > - multiple debugfs read handlers ignored the user-supplied count,
> > potentially corrupting out-of-bounds userspace data
> > - hl_device_read() was unnecessarily verbose
> > - hl_device_write() could read uninitialized stack memory
> > - multiple debugfs read handlers copied terminating null characters to
> > userspace
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > compile-tested only, so you might want to test this before applying the
> > patch
> >
> > drivers/misc/habanalabs/debugfs.c | 60 ++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/debugfs.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/debugfs.c
> > index 974a87789bd86..17ba26422b297 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/debugfs.c
> > @@ -459,41 +459,31 @@ static ssize_t mmu_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > struct hl_debugfs_entry *entry = s->private;
> > struct hl_dbg_device_entry *dev_entry = entry->dev_entry;
> > struct hl_device *hdev = dev_entry->hdev;
> > - char kbuf[MMU_KBUF_SIZE], asid_kbuf[MMU_ASID_BUF_SIZE],
> > - addr_kbuf[MMU_ADDR_BUF_SIZE];
> > + char kbuf[MMU_KBUF_SIZE];
> > char *c;
> > ssize_t rc;
> >
> > if (!hdev->mmu_enable)
> > return count;
> >
> > - memset(kbuf, 0, sizeof(kbuf));
> > - memset(asid_kbuf, 0, sizeof(asid_kbuf));
> > - memset(addr_kbuf, 0, sizeof(addr_kbuf));
> > -
> > + if (count > sizeof(kbuf) - 1)
> > + goto err;
> > if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, count))
> > goto err;
> > -
> > - kbuf[MMU_KBUF_SIZE - 1] = 0;
> > + kbuf[count] = 0;
> >
> > c = strchr(kbuf, ' ');
> > if (!c)
> > goto err;
> > + *c = '\0';
> >
> > - memcpy(asid_kbuf, kbuf, c - kbuf);
> > -
> > - rc = kstrtouint(asid_kbuf, 10, &dev_entry->mmu_asid);
> > + rc = kstrtouint(kbuf, 10, &dev_entry->mmu_asid);
> > if (rc)
> > goto err;
> >
> > - c = strstr(kbuf, " 0x");
> > - if (!c)
> > + if (strncmp(c+1, "0x", 2))
> > goto err;
> > -
> > - c += 3;
> > - memcpy(addr_kbuf, c, (kbuf + count) - c);
> > -
> > - rc = kstrtoull(addr_kbuf, 16, &dev_entry->mmu_addr);
> > + rc = kstrtoull(c+3, 16, &dev_entry->mmu_addr);
> > if (rc)
> > goto err;
> >
> > @@ -525,10 +515,8 @@ static ssize_t hl_data_read32(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
> > }
> >
> > sprintf(tmp_buf, "0x%08x\n", val);
> > - rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, strlen(tmp_buf) + 1, ppos, tmp_buf,
> > - strlen(tmp_buf) + 1);
> > -
> > - return rc;
> > + return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, tmp_buf,
> > + strlen(tmp_buf));
> > }
> >
> > static ssize_t hl_data_write32(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
> > @@ -559,7 +547,6 @@ static ssize_t hl_get_power_state(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
> > struct hl_dbg_device_entry *entry = file_inode(f)->i_private;
> > struct hl_device *hdev = entry->hdev;
> > char tmp_buf[200];
> > - ssize_t rc;
> > int i;
> >
> > if (*ppos)
> > @@ -574,10 +561,8 @@ static ssize_t hl_get_power_state(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
> >
> > sprintf(tmp_buf,
> > "current power state: %d\n1 - D0\n2 - D3hot\n3 - Unknown\n", i);
> > - rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, strlen(tmp_buf) + 1, ppos, tmp_buf,
> > - strlen(tmp_buf) + 1);
> > -
> > - return rc;
> > + return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, tmp_buf,
> > + strlen(tmp_buf));
> > }
> >
> > static ssize_t hl_set_power_state(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
> > @@ -630,8 +615,8 @@ static ssize_t hl_i2c_data_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
> > }
> >
> > sprintf(tmp_buf, "0x%02x\n", val);
> > - rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, strlen(tmp_buf) + 1, ppos, tmp_buf,
> > - strlen(tmp_buf) + 1);
> > + rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, tmp_buf,
> > + strlen(tmp_buf));
> >
> > return rc;
> > }
> > @@ -720,18 +705,9 @@ static ssize_t hl_led2_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
> > static ssize_t hl_device_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
> > size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > {
> > - char tmp_buf[200];
> > - ssize_t rc;
> > -
> > - if (*ppos)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - sprintf(tmp_buf,
> > - "Valid values: disable, enable, suspend, resume, cpu_timeout\n");
> > - rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, strlen(tmp_buf) + 1, ppos, tmp_buf,
> > - strlen(tmp_buf) + 1);
> > -
> > - return rc;
> > + static const char *help =
> > + "Valid values: disable, enable, suspend, resume, cpu_timeout\n";
> > + return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, help, strlen(help));
> > }
> >
> > static ssize_t hl_device_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
> > @@ -739,7 +715,7 @@ static ssize_t hl_device_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
> > {
> > struct hl_dbg_device_entry *entry = file_inode(f)->i_private;
> > struct hl_device *hdev = entry->hdev;
> > - char data[30];
> > + char data[30] = {0};
> >
> > /* don't allow partial writes */
> > if (*ppos != 0)
> > --
> > 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog
> >
>
> Thanks!
> Will be applied to my -next branch
>
> This patch is:
> Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
Sorry, I meant my -fixed branch, as these are definitely worth going into 5.2
I think they can also be marked as stable for back-porting.
Oded
Powered by blists - more mailing lists