[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c76a9ece-bfc9-c9dc-a0e0-a41698f56f78@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 12:46:00 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove rq->load
Hi,
On 4/24/19 10:45 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> The CFS class is the only one maintaining and using the CPU wide load
> (rq->load(.weight)). The last use case of the CPU wide load in CFS's
> set_next_entity() can be replaced by using the load of the CFS class
> (rq->cfs.load(.weight)) instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 2 --
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++-----
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 8039d62ae36e..1148f43dbd42 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -656,8 +656,6 @@ do { \
> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", #x, SPLIT_NS(rq->x))
>
> P(nr_running);
> - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lu\n", "load",
> - rq->load.weight);
> P(nr_switches);
> P(nr_load_updates);
> P(nr_uninterruptible);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index a4d9e14bf138..73a6718f29cc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2682,8 +2682,6 @@ static void
> account_entity_enqueue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
> - if (!parent_entity(se))
> - update_load_add(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, se->load.weight);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> if (entity_is_task(se)) {
> struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> @@ -2699,8 +2697,6 @@ static void
> account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
> - if (!parent_entity(se))
> - update_load_sub(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, se->load.weight);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> if (entity_is_task(se)) {
> account_numa_dequeue(rq_of(cfs_rq), task_of(se));
> @@ -4096,7 +4092,8 @@ set_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> * least twice that of our own weight (i.e. dont track it
> * when there are only lesser-weight tasks around):
> */
> - if (schedstat_enabled() && rq_of(cfs_rq)->load.weight >= 2*se->load.weight) {
> + if (schedstat_enabled() &&
> + rq_of(cfs_rq)->cfs.load.weight >= 2*se->load.weight) {
> schedstat_set(se->statistics.slice_max,
> max((u64)schedstat_val(se->statistics.slice_max),
> se->sum_exec_runtime - se->prev_sum_exec_runtime));
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index efa686eeff26..e4059e81e99c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -830,8 +830,6 @@ struct rq {
> atomic_t nohz_flags;
> #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
>
> - /* capture load from *all* tasks on this CPU: */
> - struct load_weight load;
> unsigned long nr_load_updates;
> u64 nr_switches;
Is there anything else I should do for this patch ?
Thanks,
-- Dietmar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists