linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 29/75] batman-adv: Reduce claim hash refcnt only for removed entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190506143055.827893610@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  6 May 2019 16:32:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>,
        Simon Wunderlich <sw@...onwunderlich.de>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 29/75] batman-adv: Reduce claim hash refcnt only for removed entry

[ Upstream commit 4ba104f468bbfc27362c393815d03aa18fb7a20f ]

The batadv_hash_remove is a function which searches the hashtable for an
entry using a needle, a hashtable bucket selection function and a compare
function. It will lock the bucket list and delete an entry when the compare
function matches it with the needle. It returns the pointer to the
hlist_node which matches or NULL when no entry matches the needle.

The batadv_bla_del_claim is not itself protected in anyway to avoid that
any other function is modifying the hashtable between the search for the
entry and the call to batadv_hash_remove. It can therefore happen that the
entry either doesn't exist anymore or an entry was deleted which is not the
same object as the needle. In such an situation, the reference counter (for
the reference stored in the hashtable) must not be reduced for the needle.
Instead the reference counter of the actually removed entry has to be
reduced.

Otherwise the reference counter will underflow and the object might be
freed before all its references were dropped. The kref helpers reported
this problem as:

  refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.

Fixes: 23721387c409 ("batman-adv: add basic bridge loop avoidance code")
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich <sw@...onwunderlich.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c b/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c
index c3c848f64fdd..c761c0c233e4 100644
--- a/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c
+++ b/net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c
@@ -803,6 +803,8 @@ static void batadv_bla_del_claim(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
 				 const u8 *mac, const unsigned short vid)
 {
 	struct batadv_bla_claim search_claim, *claim;
+	struct batadv_bla_claim *claim_removed_entry;
+	struct hlist_node *claim_removed_node;

 	ether_addr_copy(search_claim.addr, mac);
 	search_claim.vid = vid;
@@ -813,10 +815,18 @@ static void batadv_bla_del_claim(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
 	batadv_dbg(BATADV_DBG_BLA, bat_priv, "%s(): %pM, vid %d\n", __func__,
 		   mac, batadv_print_vid(vid));

-	batadv_hash_remove(bat_priv->bla.claim_hash, batadv_compare_claim,
-			   batadv_choose_claim, claim);
-	batadv_claim_put(claim); /* reference from the hash is gone */
+	claim_removed_node = batadv_hash_remove(bat_priv->bla.claim_hash,
+						batadv_compare_claim,
+						batadv_choose_claim, claim);
+	if (!claim_removed_node)
+		goto free_claim;

+	/* reference from the hash is gone */
+	claim_removed_entry = hlist_entry(claim_removed_node,
+					  struct batadv_bla_claim, hash_entry);
+	batadv_claim_put(claim_removed_entry);
+
+free_claim:
 	/* don't need the reference from hash_find() anymore */
 	batadv_claim_put(claim);
 }
-- 
2.20.1