[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0bdb1655-4c4e-1982-a842-9dfc7c02a576@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 08:41:05 +0200
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: freude@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] s390: vfio-ap: wait for queue empty on queue reset
On 03/05/2019 23:14, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> Refactors the AP queue reset function to wait until the queue is empty
> after the PQAP(ZAPQ) instruction is executed to zero out the queue as
> required by the AP architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 900b9cf20ca5..b88a2a2ba075 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,32 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_wait_for_qempty(unsigned long apid, unsigned long apqi)
> +{
> + struct ap_queue_status status;
> + ap_qid_t qid = AP_MKQID(apid, apqi);
> + int retry = 5;
> +
> + do {
> + status = ap_tapq(qid, NULL);
> + switch (status.response_code) {
> + case AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL:
> + if (status.queue_empty)
> + return;
> + msleep(20);
NIT: Fall through ?
> + break;
> + case AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS:
> + case AP_RESPONSE_BUSY:
> + msleep(20);
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_warn("%s: tapq err %02x: %04lx.%02lx may not be empty\n",
> + __func__, status.response_code, apid, apqi);
I do not thing the warning sentence is appropriate:
The only possible errors here are if the AP is not available due to AP
checkstop, deconfigured AP or invalid APQN.
> + return;
> + }
> + } while (--retry);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * assign_adapter_store
> *
> @@ -790,15 +816,18 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(unsigned int apid, unsigned int apqi,
> - unsigned int retry)
> +int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(unsigned int apid, unsigned int apqi)
> {
> struct ap_queue_status status;
> + int retry = 5;
>
> do {
> status = ap_zapq(AP_MKQID(apid, apqi));
> switch (status.response_code) {
> case AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL:
> + vfio_ap_mdev_wait_for_qempty(apid, apqi);
> + return 0;
> + case AP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURED:
Since you modify the switch, you can return for all the following cases:
AP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURE
..._CHECKSTOP
..._INVALID_APQN
And you should wait for qempty on AP_RESET_IN_PROGRESS along with
AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL
> return 0;
> case AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS:
> case AP_RESPONSE_BUSY:
While at modifying this function, the AP_RESPONSE_BUSY is not a valid
code for ZAPQ, you can remove this.
> @@ -824,7 +853,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> matrix_mdev->matrix.apm_max + 1) {
> for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm,
> matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm_max + 1) {
> - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(apid, apqi, 1);
> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(apid, apqi);
IMHO, since you are at changing this call, passing the apqn as parameter
would be a good simplification.
> /*
> * Regardless whether a queue turns out to be busy, or
> * is not operational, we need to continue resetting
Depends on why the reset failed, but this is out of scope.
>
--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany
Powered by blists - more mailing lists