lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 May 2019 17:05:42 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Semyon Verchenko <semverchenko@...tor-ts.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: pmc_atom: Add Lex 3I380D industrial PC to
 critclk_systems DMI table

Hi,

On 06-05-19 16:59, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 5:47 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06-05-19 14:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:01 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Lex 3I380D industrial PC has 4 ethernet controllers on board
>>>> which need pmc_plt_clk0 - 3 to function, add it to the critclk_systems
>>>> DMI table, so that drivers/clk/x86/clk-pmc-atom.c will mark the clocks
>>>> as CLK_CRITICAL and they will not get turned off.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>>> supposedly to go via CLK tree.
>>>
>>> P.S. If you want it through PDx86, I need immutable branch / tag from CLK.
>>
>> Stephen added the patches this depends on to his fixes branch, so they
>> are in the 5.1 / Torvald's master branch, since we are now in the 5.2 merge
>> window, you should be able to cleanly apply this directly.
> 
> We don't do back merges, so, our base is v5.1-rc1. Does it mean the
> commit in question is in v5.1-rc1?
> AFAICS it was appeared in v5.1-rc5.

Ah, I see, my bad.

Stephen can you pick up this patch and the
"[PATCH 1/1] Add several Beckhoff Automation boards to critclk_systems DMI table"
patch then?

Regards,

Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists