[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9cb3ce3-d97b-a8ce-252f-c7d8455f5ae1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 10:50:25 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Nariman <narimantos@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
broonie@...nel.org, yang.jie@...ux.intel.com, tiwai@...e.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_5640.c:Refactored if
statement and removed buffer
On 5/6/19 10:43 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Pierre-Louis,
>
> Nariman and the author authors of these patches are a group of students
> doing
> some kernel work for me and this is a warm-up assignment for them to get
> used
> to the kernel development process.
>
> On 06-05-19 17:21, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>
>>> static int byt_rt5640_suspend(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>>> @@ -1268,28 +1266,12 @@ static int snd_byt_rt5640_mc_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>> log_quirks(&pdev->dev);
>>> if ((byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP2_AIF2) ||
>>> - (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF2)) {
>>> -
>>> - /* fixup codec aif name */
>>> - snprintf(byt_rt5640_codec_aif_name,
>>> - sizeof(byt_rt5640_codec_aif_name),
>>> - "%s", "rt5640-aif2");
>>> -
>>> - byt_rt5640_dais[dai_index].codec_dai_name =
>>> - byt_rt5640_codec_aif_name;
>>> - }
>>> + (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF2))
>>> + byt_rt5640_dais[dai_index].codec_dai_name = "rt5640-aif2";
>>
>> This is not equivalent, you don't deal with the (byt_rt5640_quirk &
>> BYT_RT5640_SSP2_AIF2) case. The default is SSP_AIF1
>
> I might be mistaken here, but look closer, the original:
> if ((byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP2_AIF2) ||
>
> Line is kept, so the new code block is:
>
> if ((byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP2_AIF2) ||
> (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF2))
> byt_rt5640_dais[dai_index].codec_dai_name = "rt5640-aif2";
>
> Which does take the BYT_RT5640_SSP2_AIF2 into account.
Ah yes, my mistake. Looks good then.
>
>>> if ((byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF1) ||
>>> - (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF2)) {
>>> -
>>> - /* fixup cpu dai name name */
>>> - snprintf(byt_rt5640_cpu_dai_name,
>>> - sizeof(byt_rt5640_cpu_dai_name),
>>> - "%s", "ssp0-port");
>>> -
>>> - byt_rt5640_dais[dai_index].cpu_dai_name =
>>> - byt_rt5640_cpu_dai_name;
>>> - }
>>> + (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_SSP0_AIF2))
>>> + byt_rt5640_dais[dai_index].cpu_dai_name = "ssp0-port";
>>
>> Same here, this is not equivalent. the SSP0_AIF1 case is not handled.
>> it's fine to remove the intermediate buffers, but you can't remove
>> support for 2 out of the 4 combinations supported.
>
> Same remark here from me too :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists