[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <686a4d50696a87b9cbe2a5908737ce91faec5313.camel@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 17:59:04 +0200
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phil@...pberrypi.org,
stefan.wahren@...e.com, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: vchiq: revert "switch to
wait_for_completion_killable"
Hi Dan, thanks for reviewing.
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 18:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > @@ -1740,7 +1740,8 @@ parse_rx_slots(struct vchiq_state *state)
> > &service->bulk_rx : &service->bulk_tx;
> >
> > DEBUG_TRACE(PARSE_LINE);
> > - if (mutex_lock_killable(&service->bulk_mutex)) {
> > + if (mutex_lock_killable(
> > + &service->bulk_mutex) != 0) {
>
> This series does't add != 0 consistently... Personally, I would prefer
> we just leave it out. I use != 0 for two things. 1) When I'm talking
> about the number zero.
>
> if (len == 0) {
>
> Or with strcmp():
>
> if (strcmp(a, b) == 0) { // a equals b
> if (strcmp(a, b) < 0) { // a less than b.
>
> But here zero means no errors, so I would just leave it out...
I agree, I'll fix it.
Regards,
Nicolas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists