[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190507165743.GX2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 18:57:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] perf/x86: make perf callchain work without
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 09:45:47AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:52 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote:
> >
> > > Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the maintainer
> > > squash the comment update or should I send a V5?
> >
> > I've squashed it, I've just not gotten around to stuffing it a git tree
> > yet. Should happen 'soon'.
>
> Was it applied and on the way to Linus yet ?
AFAICT it has already landed in Linus' tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists