[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADyE4xHw_eikPhgsVuOwpi34vF22_i0MhVaQac0bVvKZ6hLqdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 02:22:26 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] x86: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
2019年5月7日(火) 21:54 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:41:31 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > > Kprobes sets the FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY flag, thus
> > > they can never be put at the same location that is being live patched.
> >
> > OK, so do we want to allow kprobes that also modify regs->sp ? Because
> > then we need to change these trampolines a bit.
> >
> > I'd prefer not to allow kprobes this.
>
> I believe no kprobe changes sp, because it would have had the same
> issues we are trying to solve now. And even though we are changing
> things to allow it, it's not a regression to keep kprobes from doing it.
No, kprobes doesn't allow to change sp. At this moment we can't change
"®s->sp" since it is just a value :)
kprobes user (e.g. function fault-injection) will change regs->ip,
that is why kprobes sets IPMODIFY flag.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
mailto:masami.hiramatsu@...il.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists