[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3573253-e3de-0a82-8af3-6bacea20bd97@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 10:52:06 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, jwerner@...omium.org,
groeck@...omium.org, briannorris@...omium.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add dummy for of_node_is_root if not CONFIG_OF
On 5/6/19 9:48 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> We'll add a dummy to just return false.
A more complete explanation of why this is needed please.
My one guess would be compile testing of arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
fails???
-Frank
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> include/linux/of.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 0cf857012f11..62ae5c1cafa5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -653,6 +653,11 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline bool of_node_is_root(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct device_node *of_get_compatible_child(const struct device_node *parent,
> const char *compatible)
> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists