linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 15:20:16 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call
 functions

On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:14:12 -0500
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 03:01:53PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > How's this?
> > 
> > -- Steve
> > 
> > From d29dc2e9e0275c9857932b80cebc01551b669efb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 15:11:17 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
> > 
> > In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push
> > the return address onto the stack. But because the breakpoint exception
> > frame is added to the stack when the breakpoint is hit, there's no room to
> > add the address onto the stack and return to the address of the emulated
> > called funtion.  
> 
> The 2nd sentence can probably be removed since it's technically no
> longer true, thanks to the previous patch.
> 
> > This helper functions are added:  
> 
> "These"

New version:

    x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
    
    In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push
    the return address onto the stack. The x86_64 int3 handler adds a small gap
    to allow the stack to grow some. Use this gap to add the return address to
    be able to emulate a call instruction at the breakpoint location.
    
    These helper functions are added:
    
      int3_emulate_jmp(): changes the location of the regs->ip to return there.
    
     (The next two are only for x86_64)
      int3_emulate_push(): to push the address onto the gap in the stack
      int3_emulate_call(): push the return address and change regs->ip

-- Steve