lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 14:15:05 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add dummy for of_node_is_root if not CONFIG_OF

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:59 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:52 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/6/19 9:48 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > We'll add a dummy to just return false.
> >
> > A more complete explanation of why this is needed please.
> >
> > My one guess would be compile testing of arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
> > fails???
>
> Ah, sorry.  Needed for:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=Vxp-U7mZUNmAAOja5pt-8rZqPryEvwTg_Dv3ChuH_TrA@mail.gmail.com

Should I take both patches via pstore, or should both go via DT tree?

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ