[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j++9LS-2aHR8CPoivT=5UUxkpUg=ZyEHfzXN8tGj8z7tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 14:15:05 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add dummy for of_node_is_root if not CONFIG_OF
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:59 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:52 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/6/19 9:48 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > We'll add a dummy to just return false.
> >
> > A more complete explanation of why this is needed please.
> >
> > My one guess would be compile testing of arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c
> > fails???
>
> Ah, sorry. Needed for:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=Vxp-U7mZUNmAAOja5pt-8rZqPryEvwTg_Dv3ChuH_TrA@mail.gmail.com
Should I take both patches via pstore, or should both go via DT tree?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists