[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c9d44ea-1cd2-0705-5d0f-b05af0682f90@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 16:21:02 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"open list:HARDWARE MONITORING" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kernel: Provide a __pow10() function
On 5/7/19 2:49 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/7/19 2:06 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 12:35:02PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Provide a simple macro that can return the value of 10 raised to a
>>> positive integer. We are going to use this in order to scale units from
>>> firmware to HWMON.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/kernel.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
>>> index 2d14e21c16c0..62fc8bd84bc9 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
>>> @@ -294,6 +294,17 @@ static inline u32 reciprocal_scale(u32 val, u32 ep_ro)
>>> return (u32)(((u64) val * ep_ro) >> 32);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* Return in f the value of 10 raise to the power x */
>>> +#define __pow10(x, f)( \
>>> +{ \
>>> + typeof(x) __x = abs(x); \
>>> + f = 1; \
>>> + while (__x--) \
>>> + f *= 10; \
>>> + f; \
>>> +} \
>>> +)
>>
>> Kind of unusual. I would have expected to use this like
>> f = __pow10(x);
>> ie without having to provide f as parameter. That would be much less
>> confusing. I assume this is to make the result type independent, but
>> I am not sure if that is worth the trouble.
>
> Correct, that was the intent here.
>
>>
>> Are there users outside the hwmon code ? If not, it might be simpler
>> to keep it there for now.
>
> There appears to be a few outside actually:
>
> drivers/acpi/sbs.c::battery_scale
> drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c::pow_10
>
> There could be others but those two came out as obvious candidates.
>
> Would you be okay with a local pow10 function within scmi-hwmon.c and a
> subsequent patch series providing a common function?
>
I would prefer that, actually, to reduce dependencies.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists