[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190507061503.GA20385@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 08:15:03 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 79/95] x86/asm: Remove dead __GNUC__
conditionals
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 07:57:01AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 07/05/2019 07.38, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 88ca66d8540ca26119b1428cddb96b37925bdf01 ]
> >
> > The minimum supported gcc version is >= 4.6, so these can be removed.
>
> Eh, that bump happened for the 4.19 kernel, so this is not true for the
> 4.14 branch. Has cafa0010cd51fb711fdcb50fc55f394c5f167a0a been applied
> to 4.14.y? Otherwise I don't think this is appropriate.
No, that commit is not in 4.14, so we still have to "support" older
versions of gcc there :(
Sasha, can you drop this?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists