linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: allwinner: h6: orangepi-one-plus: Add Ethernet support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 09:06:17 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-amarula <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: allwinner: h6: orangepi-one-plus: Add Ethernet
 support

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:03:15PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:16 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 05:29:28PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Add Ethernet support for orangepi-one-plus board,
> > >
> > > - Ethernet port connected via RTL8211E PHY
> > > - PHY suppiled with
> > >   GMAC-2V5, fixed regulator with GMAC_EN pin via PD6
> > >   GMAC-3V, which is supplied by VCC3V3-MAC via aldo2
> > > - RGMII-RESET pin connected via PD14
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> >
> > Your commit log should be improved. We can get those informations from
> > the patch itself...
>
> Thought it was a clear commit log :)  will update anyway.

Well, yes and no. The commit log is clear indeed, but it doesn't
provide what it's supposed to provide.

You shouldn't put *what* is being done by the patch. That's pretty
easy to figure out by reading the patch itself. You have to explain
why and how you did it, which is lacking in that case.

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)