linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 01/13] clk: samsung: add needed IDs for DMC clocks in Exynos5420

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eab8fd90-7075-3f7b-5634-553fdf32f546@partner.samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 11:25:24 +0200
From:   Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, krzk@...nel.org, kgene@...nel.org,
        kyungmin.park@...sung.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        s.nawrocki@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, tony@...mide.com, jroedel@...e.de,
        treding@...dia.com, digetx@...il.com, willy.mh.wolff.ml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/13] clk: samsung: add needed IDs for DMC clocks in
 Exynos5420



On 5/7/19 11:17 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 19. 5. 7. 오후 5:51, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> On 5/7/19 9:33 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Lukasz,
>>>
>>> On 19. 5. 7. 오전 12:11, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>>> Define new IDs for clocks used by Dynamic Memory Controller in
>>>> Exynos5422 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>    1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
>>>> index 355f469..bf50d8a 100644
>>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
>>>> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
>>>>    #define CLK_MAU_EPLL		159
>>>>    #define CLK_SCLK_HSIC_12M	160
>>>>    #define CLK_SCLK_MPHY_IXTAL24	161
>>>> +#define CLK_SCLK_BPLL		162
>>>>    
>>>>    /* gate clocks */
>>>>    #define CLK_UART0		257
>>>> @@ -195,6 +196,16 @@
>>>>    #define CLK_ACLK432_CAM		518
>>>>    #define CLK_ACLK_FL1550_CAM	519
>>>>    #define CLK_ACLK550_CAM		520
>>>> +#define CLK_CLKM_PHY0		521
>>>> +#define CLK_CLKM_PHY1		522
>>>> +#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX0_0	523
>>>> +#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX0_1	524
>>>> +#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX1_0	525
>>>> +#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX1_1	526
>>>> +#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX0_0	527
>>>> +#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX0_1	528
>>>> +#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX1_0	529
>>>> +#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX1_1	530
>>>>    
>>>>    /* mux clocks */
>>>>    #define CLK_MOUT_HDMI		640
>>>> @@ -217,6 +228,8 @@
>>>>    #define CLK_MOUT_EPLL		657
>>>>    #define CLK_MOUT_MAU_EPLL	658
>>>>    #define CLK_MOUT_USER_MAU_EPLL	659
>>>> +#define CLK_MOUT_SCLK_SPLL	660
>>>> +#define CLK_MOUT_MX_MSPLL_CCORE_PHY	661
>>>>    
>>>>    /* divider clocks */
>>>>    #define CLK_DOUT_PIXEL		768
>>>> @@ -243,13 +256,16 @@
>>>>    #define CLK_DOUT_ACLK300_GSCL	789
>>>>    #define CLK_DOUT_ACLK400_DISP1	790
>>>>    #define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_CDREX	791
>>>> -#define CLK_DOUT_SCLK_CDREX	792
>>>> -#define CLK_DOUT_ACLK_CDREX1	793
>>>> -#define CLK_DOUT_CCLK_DREX0	794
>>>> -#define CLK_DOUT_CLK2X_PHY0	795
>>>> -#define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_CORE_MEM	796
>>>
>>> The your previous patch didn't change the id number
>>> of already exiting clocks. It cause the fault.
>>> In order to keep the compatibility, you keep
>>> the original id number without modification.
>> True, the previous patch didn't change these IDs.
>> I have not seen any faults during builds and stress tests, though.
> 
> If you use the built dtb file before modification, it cause the fault.
> It is advantage of device-tree style to split out
> the dependency between kernel image and dtb.
Good point.
> 
>>>
>>> Please don't change the id number of the existing clocks
>>> and then just add the new clocks.
>> OK, I will add CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX0	and CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX1
>> at the end:
>> ------------------>8--------------------------
>> @@ -248,8 +261,11 @@
>>    #define CLK_DOUT_CCLK_DREX0    794
>>    #define CLK_DOUT_CLK2X_PHY0    795
>>    #define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_CORE_MEM 796
>> +#define CLK_FF_DOUT_SPLL2      797
>> +#define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX0    798
>> +#define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX1    799
>>
>>    /* must be greater than maximal clock id */
>> -#define CLK_NR_CLKS            797
>> +#define CLK_NR_CLKS            800
>> -----------------8<---------------------------
>>
>> Can I add your ack in the modified version?
> 
> I agree.
Thank you.

Regards,
Lukasz