lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEJqkgiB7woieNZ-vVm7x-GzVrqGpJWLXOM9JpSUgPgE7eA6gA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 11:33:01 +0200
From:   Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Kernel 5.1] ACPI_DEBUG messages without CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG being set

Am Di., 7. Mai 2019 um 10:35 Uhr schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>:
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:31 AM Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Am Di., 7. Mai 2019 um 09:01 Uhr schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>:
> > >
> >  Hello Rafael ,  Erik
> >
> > > +Erik
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 1:33 AM Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > while testing kernel-5.1 I get on one of my Lenovo Laptops very
> > > > strange 'ACPI Debug:' messages.
> > > >
> > > > After some grepping I realized these are Debug messages from DSDT ,
> > > > however my kernel does
> > > > not have ACPI_DEBUG enabled.
> > > >
> > > > I found out the module triggering this, on this Laptop is
> > > > ideapad_laptop , but looking at the code
> > > > I cannot see what would causes that.
> > > >
> > > > Also on the same Laptop with any 5.0.X kernels I cannot see these.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ~$ grep -i ACPI_DEBUG /boot/config-5.1-fw1
> > > > # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUGGER is not set
> > > > # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
> > > > # CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_DEBUGFACILITIES is not set
> > > > # CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
> > > >
> > > > .. dmesg ..
> > > > ...
> > > > [   68.020812] calling  ideapad_acpi_driver_init+0x0/0x1000
> > > > [ideapad_laptop] @ 1322
> > > > [   68.026708] input: Ideapad extra buttons as
> > > > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.0/PNP0C09:00/VPC2004:00/input/input16
> > > > [   68.038236] ACPI Debug:  "=====QUERY_64====="
> > > > [   68.050232] ACPI Debug:  "=====QUERY_65====="
> > > > [   68.060218] ACPI Debug:  "=====QUERY_64====="
> > > > [   68.092216] probe of VPC2004:00 returned 1 after 71386 usecs
> > > > [   68.092245] initcall ideapad_acpi_driver_init+0x0/0x1000
> > > > [ideapad_laptop] returned 0 after 69751 usecssg
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > These =====QUERY_XX===== messages are from DSDT:
> > > >
> > > > ~/acpi$ grep QUERY dsdt.dsl
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_11====="
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_12====="
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_24====="
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_25====="
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_37====="
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_38====="
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_64====="
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_65====="
> > > >
> > > > Also this is the code from DSDT for QUERY 64 and 65:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >             Method (_Q64, 0, NotSerialized)  // _Qxx: EC Query
> > > >            {
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_64====="
> > > >                If ((OSYS == 0x07D9))
> > > >                {
> > > >                    If (((WLEX == One) & (WLAT == One)))
> > > >                    {
> > > >                        SGOV (0x02040005, One)
> > > >                    }
> > > >                    Else
> > > >                    {
> > > >                        SGOV (0x02040005, Zero)
> > > >                    }
> > > >                }
> > > >            }
> > > >
> > > >            Method (_Q65, 0, NotSerialized)  // _Qxx: EC Query
> > > >            {
> > > >                Debug = "=====QUERY_65====="
> > > >                If ((OSYS == 0x07D9))
> > > >                {
> > > >                    If (((BTEX == One) & (BTAT == One)))
> > > >                    {
> > > >                        SGOV (0x0202000B, One)
> > > >                    }
> > > >                    Else
> > > >                    {
> > > >                        SGOV (0x0202000B, Zero)
> > > >                    }
> > > >                }
> > > >            }
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any idea what would cause this ?
> >
> > I think I found what is causing that.
> >
> > Commit aa9aaa4d61c0048d3faad056893cd7860bbc084c is moving
> > definition of Linux's  ACPI_DEBUG_DEFAULT to incude/acpi/platform/aclinux.h ,
> > however include/acpi/acpi.h didn't got updated and  ACPI_DEBUG_DEFAULT now
> > being always defined as  (ACPI_LV_INIT | ACPI_LV_DEBUG_OBJECT |
> > ACPI_LV_EVALUATION | ACPI_LV_REPAIR)
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this.
>
> include/acpi/acpi.h should get the right definitions through
> include/acpi/platform/acenv.h and include/acpi/acoutput.h that are
> included by it.
>

Hmm yes should , I missed that include. However it does not work.

I've just put back old code back into drivers/acpi/bus.c to test
and all working now fine without any other changes.

> It looks like incude/acpi/platform/aclinux.h has not been included by
> include/acpi/platform/acenv.h for some reason when building this
> module.

If this one getting it wrong all will do so , they all just include
<linux/acpi.h>.

Probably not so much users will notice that , I just did because my
BIOS vendor forgot DEBUG around.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ