[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190507125027.GV2239@kadam>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 15:50:27 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, security@...nel.org,
sasha.levin@...cle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: stm class: Prevent user-controllable allocations
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 02:41:13PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> It seems to me that we still allow overflow if count == ~0. We'll then
> allocate 0 bytes but copy ~0 bytes. That does not sound healthy.
>
> Fixes: f08b18266c7116e2ec6885dd53a928f580060a71
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> index c7ba8ac..8846fca 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ static ssize_t stm_char_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> char *kbuf;
> int err;
>
> - if (count + 1 > PAGE_SIZE)
> + if (count > PAGE_SIZE - 1)
> count = PAGE_SIZE - 1;
The "count" variable should all be checked in vfs_write(). count + off
is checked in rw_verify_area() and count is capped at MAX_RW_COUNT.
#define MAX_RW_COUNT (INT_MAX & PAGE_MASK)
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists