[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae3297cc-8a8d-a48e-159e-741c7af41cf7@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 17:22:08 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: fix locking violation in page fault handler
On 7.05.19 г. 17:12 ч., Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mai 07 2019, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com> wrote:
>
>> At the very least the code under
>> no_context label could go into it's own function since it just kills the
>> process and never returns?
>
> This is not true.
Be more specific, according to do_task_dead after the last __schedule is
called the calling context is no more?
>
> Andreas.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists