[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2365C14A-C579-497D-A271-EC24911A6BE1@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 16:13:16 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: allow non-privileged uprobe for user processes
> On May 7, 2019, at 4:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 12:43:15AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index abbd4b3b96c2..0508774d82e4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -8532,9 +8532,10 @@ static int perf_tp_event_match(struct perf_event *event,
>> if (event->hw.state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)
>> return 0;
>> /*
>> - * All tracepoints are from kernel-space.
>> + * All tracepoints except uprobes are from kernel-space.
>> */
>> - if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
>> + if (event->attr.exclude_kernel &&
>> + ((event->tp_event->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_UPROBE) == 0))
>
> That doesn't make sense; should you not be checking user_mode(regs)
> instead?
Yes! user_mode(regs) is better! V2 coming soon.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists