lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 May 2019 14:39:32 -0700
From:   Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@...gle.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Fletcher Woodruff <fletcherw@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@...omium.org>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] ASoC: rt5677: allow multiple interrupt sources

From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Date: Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:36 AM
To: Fletcher Woodruff
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ben Zhang, Jaroslav Kysela, Liam
Girdwood, Oder Chiou, Takashi Iwai, Curtis Malainey,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>

> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:01:13PM -0600, Fletcher Woodruff wrote:
>
> > This patch does not add polarity flipping support within regmap-irq
> > because there is extra work that must be done within the irq handler
> > to support hotword detection. On the Chromebook Pixel, the firmware will
> > disconnect GPIO1 from the jack detection irq when a hotword is detected
> > and trigger the interrupt handler. Inside the handler, we will need to
> > detect this, report the hotword event, and re-connect GPIO1 to the jack
> > detection irq.
>
> Please have a conversation with your firmware team about the concept of
> abstraction - this is clearly a problematic thing to do as it's causing
> the state of the system to change for devices that are mostly managed
> from the operating system.  It's not clear to me that this shouldn't be
> split off somehow so that it doesn't impact other systems using this
> hardware.
>
Pixelbooks (Samus Chromebook) are the only devices that use this part.
Realtek has confirmed this. Therefore we only have to worry about
breaking ourselves. That being said I agree there is likely a better
way to handle general abstraction here. We will need the explicit irq
handling since I will be following these patches up with patches that
enable hotwording on the codec (we will be sending the firmware to
linux-firmware as well that is needed for the process.)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ