linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190508115416.nblx7c2kocidpytm@treble>
Date:   Wed, 8 May 2019 06:54:16 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The kprobe trampolines have a FRAME_POINTER annotation that makes no
> sense. It marks the frame in the middle of pt_regs, at the place of
> saving BP.
> 
> Change it to mark the pt_regs frame as per the ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
> from the respective entry_*.S.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
> @@ -6,14 +6,15 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/asm.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> -# define SAVE_RBP_STRING "	push %" _ASM_BP "\n" \
> -			 "	mov  %" _ASM_SP ", %" _ASM_BP "\n"
> +#define ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER			\
> +	"	leaq 1(%rsp), %rbp\n"
>  #else
> -# define SAVE_RBP_STRING "	push %" _ASM_BP "\n"
> +#define ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
>  #endif

> +#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> +#define ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER			\
> +	"	movl %esp, %ebp\n"		\
> +	"	andl $0x7fffffff, %ebp\n"
> +#else
> +#define ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
> +#endif

We should put these macros in a header file somewhere (including
stringified versions).

-- 
Josh