[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190508115436.43cd6bc0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:54:36 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Cristiano Borges Cardoso <cristianoborgescardoso@...il.com>,
Nishka Dasgupta <nishka.dasgupta@...oo.com>,
Sanjana Sanikommu <sanjana99reddy99@...il.com>,
Vatsala Narang <vatsalanarang@...il.com>,
Bhanusree Pola <bhanusreemahesh@...il.com>,
Himadri Pandya <himadri18.07@...il.com>,
Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb
tree
Hi all,
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:06:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/Kconfig
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/videocodec.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/videocodec.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran_card.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran_card.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran_device.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran_device.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran_driver.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran_procfs.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zoran_procfs.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36016.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36016.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36050.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36050.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36057.h
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36060.c
> drivers/staging/media/zoran/zr36060.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 8dce4b265a53 ("media: zoran: remove deprecated driver")
>
> from the v4l-dvb tree and various commits from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just removed the files) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the v4l-dvb tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists