lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLUMRaNxwTUi9QS7-Cy-Ve4+vteBm8-jW4yzZg_QTJVChA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 19:18:36 -0700
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzejtp2010@...il.com>
Cc:     "Yang, Fei" <fei.yang@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
Subject: [REGRESSION] usb: gadget: f_fs: Allow scatter-gather buffers

Since commit 772a7a724f69 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Allow scatter-gather
buffers"), I've been seeing trouble with adb transfers in Android on
HiKey960, HiKey and now Dragonboard 845c.

Sometimes things crash, but often the transfers just stop w/o any
obvious error messages.

Initially I thought it was an issue with the HiKey960 dwc3 usb patches
being upstreamed, and was using the following hack workaround:
  https://git.linaro.org/people/john.stultz/android-dev.git/commit/?h=dev/hikey960-5.1&id=dcdadaaec9db7a7b78ea9b838dd1453359a2f388

Then dwc2 added sg support, and I ended up having to revert it to get
by on HiKey:
  https://git.linaro.org/people/john.stultz/android-dev.git/commit/?h=dev/hikey-5.1&id=6e91b4c7bd1e94bdd835263403c53e85a677b848

(See thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/8/765)

And now I've reproduced the same issue (with the same dwc3 workaround)
on the already upstream code for Dragonboard 845c.

Fei Yang has also reached out and mentioned he was seeing similar
problems with the f_fs sg support.

Andrzej: Do you have any ideas or suggestions on this? I'm happy to
test or run any debug patches, if it would help narrow the issue down.

If not, should we consider reverting the f_fs sg support?

thanks
-john

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ