[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLbFa2fbJ5zQ_BOWEMUbk1aSWQHHbdEBU7DdfvpvEOiDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 08:50:03 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, maximmi@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] packet: Fix error path in packet_init
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:33 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:47!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1
> CPU: 0 PID: 11195 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G W 5.1.0+ #33
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.3-0-ge2fc41e-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x55/0x90
> Code: 12 48 39 d7 75 39 48 8b 50 08 48 39 d7 75 1d b8 01 00 00 00 5d c3 48 89 c2 48 89 fe
> 31 c0 48 c7 c7 40 3a fe 82 e8 74 c1 78 ff <0f> 0b 48 89 fe 31 c0 48 c7 c7 f0 3a fe 82 e8 61 c1 78 ff 0f 0b 48
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90001b8be48 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 000000000000004e RBX: ffffffffa0210000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff888237a16808 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
> RBP: ffffc90001b8be48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff842c1640 R12: 0000000000000800
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffc90001b8be58 R15: ffffffffa0210000
> FS: 00007f58963c7540(0000) GS:ffff888237a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000056064c7af818 CR3: 00000001e9895000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> Call Trace:
> unregister_pernet_operations+0x34/0x110
> unregister_pernet_subsys+0x1c/0x30
> packet_exit+0x1c/0x1dd [af_packet
> __x64_sys_delete_module+0x16b/0x290
> ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
> do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x1d0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> Fix error handing path in packet_init to
> avoid possilbe issue if some error occur.
The trace is about rmmod, and the patch is in packet_init() ?
So I believe we need more explanations of why you believe this patch
is fixing the issue
the bot hit .
Thanks.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> net/packet/af_packet.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index 90d4e3c..3917c75 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -4598,14 +4598,30 @@ static void __exit packet_exit(void)
>
> static int __init packet_init(void)
> {
> - int rc = proto_register(&packet_proto, 0);
> + int rc;
>
> - if (rc != 0)
> + rc = proto_register(&packet_proto, 0);
> + if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> - sock_register(&packet_family_ops);
> - register_pernet_subsys(&packet_net_ops);
> - register_netdevice_notifier(&packet_netdev_notifier);
> + rc = sock_register(&packet_family_ops);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_proto;
> + rc = register_pernet_subsys(&packet_net_ops);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_sock;
> + rc = register_netdevice_notifier(&packet_netdev_notifier);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_pernet;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_pernet:
> + unregister_pernet_subsys(&packet_net_ops);
> +out_sock:
> + sock_unregister(PF_PACKET);
> +out_proto:
> + proto_unregister(&packet_proto);
> out:
> return rc;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists