[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190508163717.GX16052@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 22:07:17 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com, jank@...ence.com, joe@...ches.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] soundwire: intel: filter SoundWire controller device
search
On 08-05-19, 11:20, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * On some Intel platforms, multiple children of the HDAS
> > > > > + * device can be found, but only one of them is the SoundWire
> > > > > + * controller. The SNDW device is always exposed with
> > > > > + * Name(_ADR, 0x40000000) so filter accordingly
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + if (adr != 0x40000000)
> > > >
> > > > I do not recall if 4 corresponds to the links you have or soundwire
> > > > device type, is this number documented somewhere is HDA specs?
> > >
> > > I thought it was a magic number, but I did check and for once it's
> > > documented and the values match the spec :-)
> > > I see in the ACPI docs bits 31..28 set to 4 indicate a SoundWire Link Type
> > > and bits 3..0 indicate the SoundWire controller instance, the rest is
> > > reserved to zero.
> >
> > So in that case we should mask with bits 31..28 and match, who knows you
> > may have multiple controller instances in future
>
> yes, I was planning on only using the link type.
>
> > I had a vague recollection that this was documented in the spec, glad
> > that in turned out to be the case.
> >
> > Btw was the update to HDA spec made public?
>
> Not that I know of. The previous NHLT public doc has actually disappeared
> from the Intel site and I can't find it any longer, so currently the amount
> of public documentation is trending to zero :-(
>
> >
> > > > Also it might good to create a define for this
> > >
> > > I will respin this one to add the documentation above, and only filter on
> > > the 4 ms-bits. Thanks for forcing me to RTFM :-)
Yeah about that someone was indeed complaining about that on IRC, it is
shame that link is valid but doc is gone... check with Rakesh or someone
they might have a copy...
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists