[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0527d7c5-78f8-d581-1960-7ceda8bc3f49@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:30:50 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Hi Marc,
On 2/26/19 2:02 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 1/29/19 7:06 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>>
>> drivers/net/can/peak_canfd/peak_pciefd_main.c:668:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c:875:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c:422:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/net/can/at91_can.c:895:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/net/can/at91_can.c:953:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c: In function ‘pcan_usb_decode_error’:
>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c:422:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> if (n & PCAN_USB_ERROR_BUS_LIGHT) {
>> ^
>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c:428:2: note: here
>> case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
>> ^~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Notice that in some cases spelling mistakes were fixed.
>> In other cases, the /* fall through */ comment is placed
>> at the bottom of the case statement, which is what GCC
>> is expecting to find.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>
> Added to linux-can-next.
>
I wonder if there is any chance for this patch to be queued up for 5.2-rc1.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists