[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190509211221.GA4966@andrea>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 23:12:21 +0200
From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
"Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] IB/hfi1: Fix improper uses of smp_mb__before_atomic()
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:16:57AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> > >This barrier only applies to the read-modify-write operations; in
> > >particular, it does not apply to the atomic_read() primitive.
> > >
> > >Replace the barrier with an smp_mb().
> >
> > This is one of a couple of barrier issues that we are currently looking into.
> >
> > See:
> >
> > [PATCH for-next 6/9] IB/rdmavt: Add new completion inline
> >
> > We will take a look at this one as well.
>
> Thank you for the reference and for looking into this,
So, I'm planning to just drop this patch; or can I do something to help?
Please let me know.
Thanx,
Andrea
>
> Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists