[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1557442868.10635.87.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 19:01:08 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/12] ima: Implement support for module-style
appended signatures
Hi Thiago,
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index fca7a3f23321..a7a20a8c15c1 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -1144,6 +1144,12 @@ void ima_delete_rules(void)
> }
> }
>
> +#define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str),
> +
> +const char *const func_tokens[] = {
> + __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_stringify)
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY
> enum {
> mask_exec = 0, mask_write, mask_read, mask_append
> @@ -1156,12 +1162,6 @@ static const char *const mask_tokens[] = {
> "MAY_APPEND"
> };
>
> -#define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str),
> -
> -static const char *const func_tokens[] = {
> - __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_stringify)
> -};
> -
> void *ima_policy_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> {
> loff_t l = *pos;
Is moving this something left over from previous versions or there is
a need for this change?
Other than this, the patch looks good.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists