linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: Do not break early boot with probing addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 09:13:57 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        "Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...abs.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: Do not break early boot with probing
 addresses

On Thu,  9 May 2019 14:19:23 +0200
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:

> The commit 3e5903eb9cff70730 ("vsprintf: Prevent crash when dereferencing
> invalid pointers") broke boot on several architectures. The common
> pattern is that probe_kernel_read() is not working during early
> boot because userspace access framework is not ready.
> 
> The check is only the best effort. Let's not rush with it during
> the early boot.
> 
> Details:
> 
> 1. Report on Power:
> 
> Kernel crashes very early during boot with with CONFIG_PPC_KUAP and
> CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL_FEATURE_CHECK_DEBUG
> 
> The problem is the combination of some new code called via printk(),
> check_pointer() which calls probe_kernel_read(). That then calls
> allow_user_access() (PPC_KUAP) and that uses mmu_has_feature() too early
> (before we've patched features). With the JUMP_LABEL debug enabled that
> causes us to call printk() & dump_stack() and we end up recursing and
> overflowing the stack.
> 
> Because it happens so early you don't get any output, just an apparently
> dead system.
> 
> The stack trace (which you don't see) is something like:
> 
>   ...
>   dump_stack+0xdc
>   probe_kernel_read+0x1a4
>   check_pointer+0x58
>   string+0x3c
>   vsnprintf+0x1bc
>   vscnprintf+0x20
>   printk_safe_log_store+0x7c
>   printk+0x40
>   dump_stack_print_info+0xbc
>   dump_stack+0x8
>   probe_kernel_read+0x1a4
>   probe_kernel_read+0x19c
>   check_pointer+0x58
>   string+0x3c
>   vsnprintf+0x1bc
>   vscnprintf+0x20
>   vprintk_store+0x6c
>   vprintk_emit+0xec
>   vprintk_func+0xd4
>   printk+0x40
>   cpufeatures_process_feature+0xc8
>   scan_cpufeatures_subnodes+0x380
>   of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes+0xb4
>   dt_cpu_ftrs_scan_callback+0x158
>   of_scan_flat_dt+0xf0
>   dt_cpu_ftrs_scan+0x3c
>   early_init_devtree+0x360
>   early_setup+0x9c
> 
> 2. Report on s390:
> 
> vsnprintf invocations, are broken on s390. For example, the early boot
> output now looks like this where the first (efault) should be
> the linux_banner:
> 
> [    0.099985] (efault)
> [    0.099985] setup: Linux is running as a z/VM guest operating system in 64-bit mode
> [    0.100066] setup: The maximum memory size is 8192MB
> [    0.100070] cma: Reserved 4 MiB at (efault)
> [    0.100100] numa: NUMA mode: (efault)
> 
> The reason for this, is that the code assumes that
> probe_kernel_address() works very early. This however is not true on
> at least s390. Uaccess on KERNEL_DS works only after page tables have
> been setup on s390, which happens with setup_arch()->paging_init().
> 
> Any probe_kernel_address() invocation before that will return -EFAULT.

Hmm, this sounds to me that probe_kernel_address() is broken for these
architectures. Perhaps the system_state check should be in
probe_kernel_address() for those architectures?


> 
> Fixes: 3e5903eb9cff70730 ("vsprintf: Prevent crash when dereferencing invalid pointers")
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> ---
>  lib/vsprintf.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index 7b0a6140bfad..8b43a883be6b 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -640,8 +640,13 @@ static const char *check_pointer_msg(const void *ptr)
>  	if (!ptr)
>  		return "(null)";
>  
> -	if (probe_kernel_address(ptr, byte))
> -		return "(efault)";

Either that, or we add a macro to those architectures and add:

#ifdef ARCH_NO_EARLY_PROBE_KERNEL_ADDRESS

> +	/* User space address handling is not ready during early boot. */
> +	if (system_state <= SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> +		if ((unsigned long)ptr < PAGE_SIZE)
> +			return "(efault)";
> +	} else {

#endif

Why add an unnecessary branch for archs this is not a problem for?

-- Steve

> +		if (probe_kernel_address(ptr, byte))
> +			return "(efault)";
>  
>  	return NULL;
>  }