lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190509141313.GA17053@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 16:13:13 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: remove redundant update of tad_base

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:42:01PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The variable tad_base is being set to a value that is never read
> and is being over-written on the next iteration of a for-loop.
> This assignment is therefore redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")

What's that tag's function supposed to be?

I see a lot of those in commit messages but it is nowhere documented in
the tree.

$ git grep -i coverity

doesn't give anything relevant.

Hmm?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ