linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: remove redundant update of tad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190509145426.GC17053@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 16:54:26 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: remove redundant update of tad_base

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 05:46:50PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:41:13PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Bottom line of what I'm trying to say is, those tags better be useful to
> > the general kernel audience - that means, they should be documented so
> > that people can look them up - or better not be in commit messages at
> > all.
> 
> Other people will complain if you don't mention the tool name...

To quote again what I said: "... they should be documented so that
people can look them up... "

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.