linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/22] perf/x86/intel/rapl: rename internal variables in response to multi-die/pkg support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06e134aa-943a-dff9-4d33-e0bc8449f284@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 11:04:01 -0400
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] perf/x86/intel/rapl: rename internal variables in
 response to multi-die/pkg support



On 5/6/2019 5:26 PM, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> 
> Syntax update only -- no logical or functional change.
> 
> In response to the new multi-die/package changes, update variable names
> to use the more generic "pmuid" terminology, instead of "pkgid",
> as the pmu can refer to either packages or die.


The perf rapl "pmu" in the code is cross the pkg/die. We only register 
one rapl pmu for whole system for now.
I think it may be better use "die" to replace the "pkg" as well.
How about the patch as below?

Thanks,
Kan


 From a898867b24ed8ea3582b0c8b3218838701249065 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 07:21:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/rapl: rename internal variables in 
response to multi-die/pkg support

Syntax update only -- no logical or functional change.

In response to the new multi-die/package changes, update variable names
to use "die" terminology, instead of "pkg".
For previous platforms which doesn't have multi-die, "die" is identical
as "pkg".

Originally-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
---
  arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 14 +++++++-------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index e49f69c..f7fc94d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct rapl_pmu {

  struct rapl_pmus {
  	struct pmu		pmu;
-	unsigned int		maxpkg;
+	unsigned int		maxdie;
  	struct rapl_pmu		*pmus[];
  };

@@ -161,13 +161,13 @@ static u64 rapl_timer_ms;

  static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
  {
-	unsigned int pkgid = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+	unsigned int dieid = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);

  	/*
  	 * The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
  	 * existent mappings in the topology map.
  	 */
-	return pkgid < rapl_pmus->maxpkg ? rapl_pmus->pmus[pkgid] : NULL;
+	return dieid < rapl_pmus->maxdie ? rapl_pmus->pmus[dieid] : NULL;
  }

  static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -668,22 +668,22 @@ static void cleanup_rapl_pmus(void)
  {
  	int i;

-	for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxdie; i++)
  		kfree(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
  	kfree(rapl_pmus);
  }

  static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
  {
-	int maxpkg = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_die_per_package();
+	int maxdie = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_die_per_package();
  	size_t size;

-	size = sizeof(*rapl_pmus) + maxpkg * sizeof(struct rapl_pmu *);
+	size = sizeof(*rapl_pmus) + maxdie * sizeof(struct rapl_pmu *);
  	rapl_pmus = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!rapl_pmus)
  		return -ENOMEM;

-	rapl_pmus->maxpkg		= maxpkg;
+	rapl_pmus->maxdie		= maxdie;
  	rapl_pmus->pmu.attr_groups	= rapl_attr_groups;
  	rapl_pmus->pmu.task_ctx_nr	= perf_invalid_context;
  	rapl_pmus->pmu.event_init	= rapl_pmu_event_init;
-- 
2.7.4