lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73927ccf-1582-2e91-051b-b22854df3290@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 May 2019 23:26:04 +0800
From:   Heyi Guo <guoheyi@...wei.com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
        wanghaibin 00208455 <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Does it make sense to flush ap_list of offlined vcpu?

Hi folks,

When guest OS calls PSCI CPU_OFF, the corresponding VCPU will be put in sleep state. But if there is still IRQ remaining in this VCPU's ap_list, this will block all the following triggers of this IRQ even to other VCPUs. Does it make sense to flush the ap_list of the VCPU when it is requested to be offlined? Or did I miss something?

Thanks,

Heyi


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ