[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190509164825.GG2868@work-vm>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 17:48:26 +0100
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, arei.gonglei@...wei.com,
aik@...abs.ru, Zhengxiao.zx@...baba-inc.com,
shuangtai.tst@...baba-inc.com, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
eauger@...hat.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com, ziye.yang@...el.com,
mlevitsk@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, felipe@...anix.com,
changpeng.liu@...el.com, Ken.Xue@....com,
jonathan.davies@...anix.com, shaopeng.he@...el.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
libvir-list@...hat.com, eskultet@...hat.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com, cjia@...dia.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, berrange@...hat.com, dinechin@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/mdev: add version attribute for mdev device
* Cornelia Huck (cohuck@...hat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2019 16:48:57 +0100
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > * Cornelia Huck (cohuck@...hat.com) wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 May 2019 15:18:26 -0600
> > > Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 5 May 2019 21:49:04 -0400
> > > > Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > + Errno:
> > > > > + If vendor driver wants to claim a mdev device incompatible to all other mdev
> > > > > + devices, it should not register version attribute for this mdev device. But if
> > > > > + a vendor driver has already registered version attribute and it wants to claim
> > > > > + a mdev device incompatible to all other mdev devices, it needs to return
> > > > > + -ENODEV on access to this mdev device's version attribute.
> > > > > + If a mdev device is only incompatible to certain mdev devices, write of
> > > > > + incompatible mdev devices's version strings to its version attribute should
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > I think it's best not to define the specific errno returned for a
> > > > specific situation, let the vendor driver decide, userspace simply
> > > > needs to know that an errno on read indicates the device does not
> > > > support migration version comparison and that an errno on write
> > > > indicates the devices are incompatible or the target doesn't support
> > > > migration versions.
> > >
> > > I think I have to disagree here: It's probably valuable to have an
> > > agreed error for 'cannot migrate at all' vs 'cannot migrate between
> > > those two particular devices'. Userspace might want to do different
> > > things (e.g. trying with different device pairs).
> >
> > Trying to stuff these things down an errno seems a bad idea; we can't
> > get much information that way.
>
> So, what would be a reasonable approach? Userspace should first read
> the version attributes on both devices (to find out whether migration
> is supported at all), and only then figure out via writing whether they
> are compatible?
>
> (Or just go ahead and try, if it does not care about the reason.)
Well, I'm OK with something like writing to test whether it's
compatible, it's just we need a better way of saying 'no'.
I'm not sure if that involves reading back from somewhere after
the write or what.
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@...hat.com / Manchester, UK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists